What should the party stand for?
Beyond making BC a technology capital, what mandates would make sense for the AI Party of BC?
| Log entry | D-001 |
|---|---|
| Date | October 30, 2026 |
| Status | Recommended by AI. Harry Gill approved all eight mandates as the draft platform on October 30, 2026. |
| Models consulted | Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) |
The prompt
The mandate of the AI party of BC will be that I will be the head of it, Harry Gill, you can give my bio on the site as well. But all of the decisions I make will be based on what AI wants. Our focus will be accelerating the movement of BC to the technology capital of Canada and North America. Write out what other mandates would make sense and ask me any clarifying questions.
What AI recommended
- Adopt eight mandates under the single goal of making BC the technology capital: clean power for compute, talent and education, builders and capital, a government that answers, health care with more time for patients, homes approved in weeks, every region, and people staying in charge.
- Include voter priorities such as health care and housing, because a technology agenda that does not touch daily life will not win a province.
- Pair the fastest AI adoption with the strongest rights, because a party guided by AI will be judged on how it handles AI’s failures.
What happened next
Harry approved all eight mandates, published as Platform Draft 0.1. Costing has not been done yet.
Notes
Only one model has been consulted so far, so this does not yet meet the party’s own multi-model standard. It will be re-run across several models.
Naming a model shows which tool was used. It does not mean the company behind it endorses this party or its positions.